On 2018-06-18 20:34, Matt Sicker wrote:
There's plenty of good reasons to migrate! I've just been rather busy
lately (currently closing on a new condo), so I haven't had a chance to
follow through with this. Since there are pom updates and site patches to
accompany this, I'd rather not launch it off when I can't intervene to
clean up the results.
I hope you haven't taken this message as an offense and if so I would
like to apologize. I've not intended in no way to make this message an
offense but upon receiving a feedback from infra I thought this is
something worth to be shared with everyone.
On 18 June 2018 at 13:22, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
Moving to gitbox would give github users ci outputs and thus provide
automated feedbacks from ci when pull requests are built.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#
issue/INFRA-14492/comment/16516065
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, 16:57 Matt Sicker, <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
I haven't had a chance to follow up with Infra (since I know this will
take
a bit of collaboration to change). I'm thinking to start backwards from
any
repos that don't have any upcoming or recent releases, then progressing
forward until all of them have been moved.
On 13 June 2018 at 20:19, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
Whatever happened with this?
Ralph
On May 7, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
And here is my +1.
This vote passes with 5 +1s binding and 1 +1 non-binding. I'll follow
up
with the migration details over the next couple days.
On 30 April 2018 at 07:04, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
+1
Ralph
On Apr 29, 2018, at 7:38 PM, Ílson Bolzan <ilbol...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Good point on the clarification. I said all git repos, and that
actually
entails:
* chainsaw
* log4cxx
* log4j2 and all its repos
* log4net
* log4php
* parent pom
In fact, the only repos this doesn't cover are the old log4j 1 svn
repos
that we have.
On 29 April 2018 at 05:08, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1
Also for the log4net repository.
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, 23:59 Remko Popma, <remko.po...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Gary Gregory <
garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
Gary
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 17:12 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
This is a vote to migrate from the existing git-wip-us
infrastructure
to
the currently supported gitbox infrastructure that Infra
advocates
for
using nowadays. Using gitbox will allow our projects to
integrate
better
with GitHub including the ability to merge PRs directly from
the
site
and
the ability to push commits to GitHub and have them be
automatically
mirrored back to Apache. Not only that, but new Apache
projects
cannot
use
the old git-wip-us infrastructure anymore, so it makes sense
to
migrate
to
the best supported option going forward.
The migration process will entail the following:
* Marking existing git repo as read-only
* Moving repo to gitbox
* Update website and pom.xml with new SCM URLs
* Update local git clones with the new remote URL(s)
Note that this vote only applies to the source code. I'm not
considering
using GitHub Issues instead of Jira, for example. Note also
that
this
vote
does not apply to the use of subversion for publishing the
site
(svnpubsub)
nor the use of it for publishing releases (only available via
svn),
though
moving the sites from svnpubsub to gitpubsub (i.e., storing
the
generated
site in a branch called "asf-site", similar to the "gh-pages"
branch
feature on GitHub) would be a related topic to cover
separately.
Please vote +1, +0, -0, or -1.
--
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
--
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
--
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
--
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>