My guess is that 99.9% of the time you would get back the same value as the
logger name.
Ralph
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:31 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At work, we have tons of loggers, mostly based on class names, with also
> some general purpose loggers.
>
> We have had different UIs over the years to deal with configuration but one
> thing we have never had is the description of what a logger does.
>
> What do you think of being able to say things like:
>
> LogManager.getLogger("com.example.foo", "Logs foos on sunny days.")
>
> It would then be handy to ask a logger context to describe itself, which a
> server could then send to a client to help fiddle loggers for dynamic
> debugging.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Gary
