Thanks for the context, Gary! On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 06:03, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> Indeed. I use Log4j with MongoDB at work. My goal in supporting MongoDB 2 > and 3 drivers was to allow to match our customer's MongoDB environment, > which we are not able to control in all cases. Note that there is no Mongo > 4 driver to match the server so I can only assume that the version 3 driver > works with server 4. > > Right, now I have no reason to take the version 2 plugin out in Log4j 3.0, > especially since it is in a separate plugin. > > Gary > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 6:30 PM Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I believe support for Mongo was added by Gary so I am expecting he might > > have more input into this. > > > > Ralph > > > > > On Jun 2, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I haven't kept up with MongoDB in quite some time (I'm more interested > > > in tech like Cassandra or Postgres), so I wouldn't be able to say > > > there. If it's anything like other databases, it might work to simply > > > use the oldest compatible driver that supports the necessary features. > > > > > > On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 17:03, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Looking at the MongoDB web site I see release 4 and release 3. We have > > support for release 2 and 3. Do we really need support for version 2 in > the > > 3.0 branch? Is anything special required to support MongoDB 4? > > >> > > >> Ralph > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
