I'm planning to test and benchmark with several projects I'm responsible for 
today.

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, at 10:03, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Thanks Gary, although it would have been nice to have had feedback on the 
> failing unit test in the 4 months since it has been in place instead of 
> waiting until after the release vote to test it.
> 
> Are any other PMC members planning on voting on the release or do I need to 
> create another release candidate?
> 
> Ralph
> 
> 
> > On Dec 10, 2019, at 7:57 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > I'm not OK with that kind of workaround, as a user it does not inspire
> > confidence. I won't -1 though.
> > 
> > Gary
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:21 AM Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> So add @Ignore to that one test.
> >> 
> >> Ralph
> >> 
> >>> On Dec 9, 2019, at 10:18 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> The problem is that it prevents from running a full build on Windows in
> >>> sane manner. I can skip the tests but that does not give me confidence
> >> :-(
> >>> 
> >>> Gary
> >>> 
> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 10:49 PM Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Having looked at the test it is checking for “\n\t” in the result. The
> >>>> test should not do that. I will modify it but I don’t think that is a
> >>>> reason to block the release, assuming it gets enough votes.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Ralph
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Dec 9, 2019, at 8:44 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> OK, that test was added 2 days after the last release in August. I
> >> guess
> >>>> that means you haven’t done a full build since then?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Ralph
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> On Dec 9, 2019, at 8:42 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Oh wait, I am looking at the wrong class. Let me check again.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Ralph
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2019, at 8:40 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> That test class hasn’t been modified since the last release. I
> >>>> obviously don’t get that error on my Mac and I have run the build many
> >>>> times, so it must be something Windows related. Is that the only problem
> >>>> you encountered with the release?
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Ralph
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> I get this failure running 'mvn clean package':
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failures:
> >>>>>>>> [ERROR] LoggerTest.builder:69 Incorrect message 3
> >>>>>>>> Expected: a string starting with " WARN Log4j rocks!
> >>>> java.lang.Throwable:
> >>>>>>>> This is a test\n\tat
> >>>>>>>> org.apache.logging.log4j.LoggerTest.builder(LoggerTest.java:65)"
> >>>>>>>> but: was " WARN Log4j rocks! java.lang.Throwable: This is a test
> >>>>>>>> at
> >> org.apache.logging.log4j.LoggerTest.builder(LoggerTest.java:65)
> >>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> >>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> >>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
> >>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:384)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:345)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:126)
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:418)
> >>>>>>>> "
> >>>>>>>> [INFO]
> >>>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 643, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 3
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Maybe this test has some hard-coded EOLs?
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f)
> >>>>>>>> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.3\bin\..
> >>>>>>>> Java version: 1.8.0_231, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
> >>>> C:\Program
> >>>>>>>> Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_231\jre
> >>>>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> >>>>>>>> OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family:
> >>>> "windows"
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 12:16 AM Ralph Goers <
> >>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.13.0, the next version of the
> >>>> Log4j 2
> >>>>>>>>> project.
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers
> >>>> list.
> >>>>>>>>> [] +1, release the artifacts
> >>>>>>>>> [] -1, don't release because...
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). All
> >>>> votes
> >>>>>>>>> are welcome and we encourage everyone to test the release, but only
> >>>> Logging
> >>>>>>>>> PMC votes are “officially” counted. As always, at least 3 +1 votes
> >>>> and more
> >>>>>>>>> positive than negative votes are required.
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Changes in this release include:
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> New Features
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2732: Add ThreadContext.putIfNotNull method. Thanks to
> >>>>>>>>> Matt Pavlovich.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2731: Add a Level Patttern Selector.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-63: Add experimental support for Log4j 1 configuration
> >>>>>>>>> files.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2716: Add the ability to lookup Kubernetes attributes
> >> in
> >>>>>>>>> the Log4j configuration. Allow Log4j properties to be retrieved
> >> from
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> Spring environment if it is available.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2710: Allow Spring Boot application properties to be
> >>>>>>>>> accessed in the Log4j 2 configuration. Add lower and upper case
> >>>> Lookups.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2639: Add builder pattern to Logger interface.
> >>>>>>>>> Fixed Bugs
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2058: Prevent recursive calls to
> >>>>>>>>> java.util.LogManager.getLogger().
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2725: LOG4J2-2725 - Added try/finally around
> >>>>>>>>> event.execute() for RingBufferLogEventHandler to clear memory
> >>>> correctly in
> >>>>>>>>> case of exception/error Thanks to Dzmitry Anikechanka.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2635: Wrong java version check in
> >>>>>>>>> ThreadNameCachingStrategy. Thanks to Filipp Gunbin.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2674: Use a less confusing name for the
> >>>>>>>>> CompositeConfiguration source. Thanks to Anton Korenkov.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2727: Add setKey method to Kafka Appender Builder.
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>> to Clément Mathieu.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2707: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException could occur with
> >>>> MAC
> >>>>>>>>> address longer than 6 bytes. Thanks to Christian Frank.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2712: The rolling file appenders would fail to compress
> >>>>>>>>> the file after rollover if the file name matched the file pattern.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2693: @PluginValue does not support attribute names
> >>>>>>>>> besides "value".
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2647: Validation blocks definition of script in
> >>>>>>>>> properties configuration.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2680: Set result of rename action to true if file was
> >>>>>>>>> copied. Thanks to Guillermo Xavier Hurtado Garcia.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J-2672: Add automatic module names where missing. Thanks
> >> to
> >>>>>>>>> Stephen Colebourne.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2673: OutputStreamAppender.Builder ignores setFilter().
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks to Yuichi Sugimura.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2725: Prevent a memory leak when async loggers throw
> >>>>>>>>> errors. Thanks to Dzmitry Anikechanka.
> >>>>>>>>> Changes
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2701: Update Jackson to 2.9.10.
> >>>>>>>>> • LOG4J2-2709: Allow message portion of GELF layout to be
> >>>>>>>>> formatted using a PatternLayout. Allow ThreadContext attributes to
> >> be
> >>>>>>>>> explicitly included or excluded in the GelfLayout.
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Tag:
> >>>>>>>>> a) for a new copy do "git clone
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2.git"; and then "git
> >> checkout
> >>>>>>>>> tags/log4j-2.13.0-rc1”
> >>>>>>>>> b) for an existing working copy to “git pull” and then “git
> >> checkout
> >>>>>>>>> tags/log4j-2.13.0-rc1”
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Web Site: http://rgoers.github.io/log4j2-site/index.html.
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Maven Artifacts:
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1049
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Distribution archives:
> >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j/
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> You may download all the Maven artifacts by executing:
> >>>>>>>>> wget -e robots=off --cut-dirs=7 -nH -r -p -np
> >> --no-check-certificate
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1049/org/apache/logging/log4j/
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Ralph
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> 
> 
> 

-ck

Reply via email to