sounds good to me. On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 04:24, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
> I started looking at log4j-core in master today with an eye towards > creating the module-info.java file. As I went through it I realized we > would have to expose almost all of the packages because we have co-mingled > private implementations along with public interfaces and abstract class. We > really can’t move the public classes as user’s are currently referencing > them so I am proposing that we move the private classes. I already started > that with LogBuilder by creating a directory named “internal” off of core. > Rather than having internal directories all over the place I am thinking we > should mimic the same existing package structure under the internal > directory and move private classes there. > > Thoughts? > > Ralph > -- Regards, Andrew Marlow http://www.andrewpetermarlow.co.uk
