Is this worthy doing in 2.0? In 3 we can do whatever we want IMO. Gary
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 23:24 Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > I started looking at log4j-core in master today with an eye towards > creating the module-info.java file. As I went through it I realized we > would have to expose almost all of the packages because we have co-mingled > private implementations along with public interfaces and abstract class. We > really can’t move the public classes as user’s are currently referencing > them so I am proposing that we move the private classes. I already started > that with LogBuilder by creating a directory named “internal” off of core. > Rather than having internal directories all over the place I am thinking we > should mimic the same existing package structure under the internal > directory and move private classes there. > > Thoughts? > > Ralph >
