I tried running mvn site for log4cxx and it failed. Since the pom is still 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT everything that refers to the version would be wrong. If I just patch the download page then the changes page won’t reflect whatever was done in 0.11.0. I also noticed that the source links are pointing to gitbox. Is that desired or should they point to GitHub?
At this point I am not sure how to update the site. Thoughts? Ralph > On Aug 21, 2020, at 2:18 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > I have moved the files to the release folder. I will look at updating the web > site. > > Ralph > >> On Aug 18, 2020, at 4:49 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> >> I’ll take care of it. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Aug 18, 2020, at 3:46 PM, Robert Middleton <osfan6...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> By my count at this point, that means we have 3 binding +1 votes from >>> Ralph, Christian, Remko; and +1 votes from Thorsten and Stephen. >>> >>> Ralph, do you want to upload to the releases repo with the fix for the .sha >>> file, or do you want me to do that?(it is a SHA-512, it's just named >>> incorrectly) >>> >>> -Robert Middleton >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:47 AM Stephen Webb <swebb2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I am using a recent version in production Ubuntu servers, so it is >>>> definitely release ready. >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 7:27 PM Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I am not an expert on c++ or something, but I looked on the content, read >>>>> this thread and think it is safe to release this. However, my hope is >>>> that >>>>> in future more competent cxx devs than me would check it :) >>>>> >>>>> I vote +1 also >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Christian >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, at 08:08, Ralph Goers wrote: >>>>>> I noticed that the files have she and md5 files. We are not supposed to >>>>>> use either of these any more and only use sha512. I can fix that. >>>>>> >>>>>> I vote +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Ralph >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Aug 9, 2020, at 10:24 AM, Robert Middleton <osfan6...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've run through the release of log4cxx 0.11.0. There's still >>>>> something >>>>>>> strange about how it all works(mostly due to the tooling of shell >>>>>>> script/maven/ant/cmake/autotools). However, I do believe that I >>>> have a >>>>>>> workable release at this point. A quick note on the release: I did >>>> the >>>>>>> 'mvn release:prepare' manually, which is where these artifacts come >>>>> from; >>>>>>> running through the 'mvn release:perform' causes the generated files >>>>> to be >>>>>>> -SNAPSHOT versioned, instead of 0.11.0. This means that the version >>>>> of the >>>>>>> pom.xml in the tag is still 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT, but since maven isn't >>>>> really >>>>>>> used to build I don't think this will be an issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Artifacts uploaded here: >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4cxx/ >>>>>>> tag: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/tree/v0.11.0-RC2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The artifacts are signed, although I still need to send my key to >>>> Matt >>>>> so >>>>>>> he can import it into the logging KEYS file. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Robert Middleton >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> >> > > >
