Yes. I thought I posted results. Ralph
> On May 6, 2021, at 7:59 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is this vote finished, Ralph? > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 15:53 Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We should at least retain the information of which older version of Log4j >> maps to which older version of Java. >> >> I thought it would be nice to keep the links but don’t feel super strongly >> about it. >> >> :-) >> >> >> >>> On Mar 16, 2021, at 5:01, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> The files will always be available on >>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/logging/log4j/ including all our >>> historical releases. I'm not so sure we need to keep the EOL'd >>> artifacts on downloads.apache.org anymore. >>> >>>> On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 14:38, Jochen Wiedmann < >> jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:35 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> PS: publicizing the links gives me an impression of support. >>>> >>>> And keeping the dist files doesn't? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before >>>> you break 'em. >>>> >>>> -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time) >>
