Is this vote finished, Ralph? On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 15:53 Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We should at least retain the information of which older version of Log4j > maps to which older version of Java. > > I thought it would be nice to keep the links but don’t feel super strongly > about it. > > :-) > > > > > On Mar 16, 2021, at 5:01, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The files will always be available on > > https://archive.apache.org/dist/logging/log4j/ including all our > > historical releases. I'm not so sure we need to keep the EOL'd > > artifacts on downloads.apache.org anymore. > > > >> On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 14:38, Jochen Wiedmann < > jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:35 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Gary > >>> PS: publicizing the links gives me an impression of support. > >> > >> And keeping the dist files doesn't? > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before > >> you break 'em. > >> > >> -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time) >
