+1, Option 1 People should migrate to log4j2.
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 01:56, Tim Perry <tim.v...@gmail.com> wrote: > I propose that this vote should stay open longer than 72 hours given that > we are coming up on New Years and many people who would wish to weigh in > might be on vacation right now. > > Tim > > > On Dec 29, 2021, at 2:29 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Consistent contributors are frequently invited to be committers and > later PMC members. Having at least three people maintaining anything is an > Apache standard for maintaining vendor neutrality, ensuring a minimum > number of people can verify release candidates to address security issues > or any other releases. > > > > — > > Matt Sicker > > > >> On Dec 29, 2021, at 14:41, Vladimir Sitnikov < > sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Log4j is owned by the Logging Services PMC. You cannot incubate it > without > >> this PMC’s approval. > >> > >> Exactly. As far as I understand, Logging pmc should accept patches and > >> release fixes or they should approve reincubating. > >> Of course, you can try rejecting patches and disapprove reincubation, > >> however, that won't hold water. > >> > >> Unfortunately, I have not seen the response from the logging pmc > regarding > >> approve/disapprove re-incubating. There's a pending question to Ron > still. > >> > >> I do not consider forks outside of the ASF. > >> > >>> But I notice the one topic you did not respond to was the lack of > >> interested people other than yourself. Why is that? > >> > >> I find the question irrelevant, and I find it has nothing to do with > >> accepting patches and releasing 1.2 > >> I belive there were even people on incubator thread, so it is strange > why > >> do you demand that I provide you with a list of rock-star 1.x > maintainers. > >> > >> 1) I can't guarantee I will be alive in February. Can you guarantee all > the > >> logging pmc members will be alive then? I doubt so. So I find that > >> questions like "how can we be sure you will send patches" too intimate. > >> > >> 2) I have already filed a patch for buildscripts. Whould you review it > and > >> merge? > >> > >> 3) Suppose I find a team (e.g 4-5 ASF fellows) who are willing to > support > >> 1.2. What do you do then? Would you add all of them to the logging pmc? > >> I don't really see the point why do you ask, and at the same time I > can't > >> guarantee the people I gather will be alive tomorrow. I can't guarantee > >> they will always have interest in 1.2 > >> > >> Vladimir > -- Dominik Psenner
