I kind of like Matt's solution of just telling people to exclude those artifacts when they don't need them. Otherwise we'll have the same issue in reverse: requests from people about how to include the "missing" dependencies....
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 8:56 PM Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 19:32, Tim Perry <tim.v...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Will including `com.sun.activation:jakarta.activation` and > > `com.sun.mail:smtp` be a problem on application servers > > that already include implementations of them? My > > knowledge of the J2EE application servers is incomplete > > for the modern (Java 11+) versions. > > You were right on the spot: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3554 > > I believe we should remove the implementation artifacts from the POM > and leave just the APIs (as `provided`). > > Piotr >
