But never mind. Now that I look I see that dist/dev/log4net has a binaries and 
sources directory. I am used to the way log4j does it where they are together.  
So they are there.

Ralph

> On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> 
> You publish to dist/dev for the vote. We review it there. You then move it to 
> dist/release after the vote passes. You obviously will not see them there - 
> or publicly in the downloads until they are moved to the release directory 
> when the vote passes.
> 
> The ASF requires the source zip be in the downloads directory - which means 
> they have to also be in the dist directory adjacent to the binaries. See 
> https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 2:04 PM, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> It is on GitHub (both in git and zip at the release), but having checked out 
>> the svn repo at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ on this 
>> machine, I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts that I added the other day, and 
>> that comes back to my question about them not showing up in the d/l 
>> locations :/ obviously, I'm doing Something Wrong.
>> 
>> I've re-committed from my linux machine - perhaps with better effect?
>> -d
>> On Jul 29 2022, at 10:37 pm, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>> Also, is the web site being updated for the release. While not required for 
>>> a release we usually have a web site to review with a release.
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are 
>>>> for the user’s convenience.
>>>> 
>>>> Ralph
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rmiddle...@apache.org> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
>>>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
>>>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
>>>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Robert Middleton
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
>>>>> <davyd.mcc...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 
>>>>>> release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: 
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>>>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to 
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>>>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at 
>>>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is probably why download links from 
>>>>>> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't 
>>>>>> working?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing 
>>>>>> something obvious ):
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> -d
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to