But never mind. Now that I look I see that dist/dev/log4net has a binaries and sources directory. I am used to the way log4j does it where they are together. So they are there.
Ralph > On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > You publish to dist/dev for the vote. We review it there. You then move it to > dist/release after the vote passes. You obviously will not see them there - > or publicly in the downloads until they are moved to the release directory > when the vote passes. > > The ASF requires the source zip be in the downloads directory - which means > they have to also be in the dist directory adjacent to the binaries. See > https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages > > Ralph > >> On Jul 29, 2022, at 2:04 PM, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> It is on GitHub (both in git and zip at the release), but having checked out >> the svn repo at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ on this >> machine, I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts that I added the other day, and >> that comes back to my question about them not showing up in the d/l >> locations :/ obviously, I'm doing Something Wrong. >> >> I've re-committed from my linux machine - perhaps with better effect? >> -d >> On Jul 29 2022, at 10:37 pm, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >>> Also, is the web site being updated for the release. While not required for >>> a release we usually have a web site to review with a release. >>> >>> Ralph >>>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are >>>> for the user’s convenience. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rmiddle...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually >>>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of >>>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote. >>>>> >>>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures >>>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development. >>>>> >>>>> -Robert Middleton >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl >>>>> <davyd.mcc...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all >>>>>> >>>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 >>>>>> release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1 >>>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however >>>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at >>>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net >>>>>> >>>>>> This is probably why download links from >>>>>> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't >>>>>> working? >>>>>> >>>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing >>>>>> something obvious ): >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> -d >>>> >>> >> >
