Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as 
release manager you will be voting +1.

However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do that 
before you send it there.

Ralph

> On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Same here. I can review over the weekend.
> 
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> 
> wrote:
>> 
>> I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until 
>> Saturday.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rmiddle...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net).  That can of
>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>>> 
>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>>> 
>>> -Robert Middleton
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
>>> <davyd.mcc...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all
>>>> 
>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 
>>>> release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: 
>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to 
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at 
>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>>> 
>>>> This is probably why download links from 
>>>> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't 
>>>> working?
>>>> 
>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing 
>>>> something obvious ):
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -d
>> 

Reply via email to