Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as release manager you will be voting +1.
However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do that before you send it there. Ralph > On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Same here. I can review over the weekend. > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: >> >> I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until >> Saturday. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rmiddle...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually >>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of >>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote. >>> >>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures >>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development. >>> >>> -Robert Middleton >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl >>> <davyd.mcc...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 >>>> release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: >>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1 >>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however >>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at >>>> https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net >>>> >>>> This is probably why download links from >>>> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't >>>> working? >>>> >>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing >>>> something obvious ): >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -d >>
