Awesome!  Thanks for the packaging work that you do.  Once we get it
voted on you should have a proper release.

-Robert Middleton

On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 2:52 PM Tobias Frost <t...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Update:
>
> FTP masters have been very quick and approved the package, so the snapshot is
> already in experimental. [1]
>
> I've also rebuilt all reverse depdencies successfully and asked the release 
> team
> to approve the transition. [2]
>
> [1] https://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/log4cxx
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027746
>
> Cheers,
> --
> tobi
>
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 10:52:43AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 05:21:34PM -0500, Robert Middleton wrote:
> >
> > > The last time we talked about this Tobias Frost said that the
> > > soft-freeze for Debian is the 12th of January[1], so after that point
> > > an updated library wouldn't make it into Debian.  I would like to get
> > > this version into Debian if possible(as that is the distribution I
> > > use), but that depends on Tobias' availability.
> >
> > To have a chance to make that happen, I've started the transistion workflow 
> > [1].
> > TBH, due to the soft freeze is in less than two weeks, changes are high that
> > we won't make it, but at least I want to have tried it.
> >
> > The first step is "Upload your new version to experimental (and have it 
> > clear
> > NEW)", which is what I've just have done: I've uploaded a snapshot (commit
> > cbd23ff1) to debian experimental. This needs now to be approved by the 
> > (Debian)
> > ftp masters, which is (usually) for such a change quick, but if they aren't 
> > or
> > not happy for any reason, this can spoil the game. [2]
> >
> > Only after that, I can ask for a transition slot from the release team. If 
> > they are
> > not happy with a transition that late (IOW that short before the freeze), 
> > well
> > that will be something I have to accept and that will mean 1.0.0 not in
> > bookworm.
> >
> > In parallel I'll see if the reverse dependencies are still building with the
> > new version, as for any breakage I will need to have patches available…
> >
> > So, let's see how it works out.
> >
> > [1] if you want to know the details: 
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
> > [2] It needs to go through NEW due to the binary package rename, due to the 
> > SONAME bump.
> >
> > --
> > tobi

Reply via email to