Given we create a major release once a decade, I doubt if we need a `main`. In 2043, we can fork `4.x` from `3.x`.
Do you think there is a certain advantage of keeping `main` around? On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 4:51 PM Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Volkan, > > On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 16:44, Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote: > > I want to rename the branches as follows: > > `master` -> `3.x` > > `release-2.x` -> `2.x` > > I am fine with both `3.x` and `main`. Some people have a problem with > `master` and we don't have any problems with `main` or `3.x` so let's > rename both branches in any case. > > If we are serious about releasing `3.0.0-alpha1`, we should also set > `main` as default branch. > > Piotr >
