Could you mind explaining your reasoning for keeping a `main` rather than `3.x`? What does former offer that the latter falls short of?
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, 17:39 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > I’ve said this previously. I am not in favor of having a 3.x branch until > we need to start work on 4.x. master/main should be the main branch. It > should become the default once 3.0-anything is released. > > Ralph > > > On Feb 8, 2023, at 8:45 AM, Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote: > > > > There have already been discussions going on for some time, but nothing > > concrete has been decided yet. Let's get this sorted out. > > > > I want to rename the branches as follows: > > `master` -> `3.x` > > `release-2.x` -> `2.x` > > > > I know Piotr is concerned about ordering in GitHub (that is, `3.x` should > > appear at the top even though `2.x` is the default one), but I am not. > For > > one, this is not a concern for maintainers. Second, we can update README > to > > assist contributors. > > > > Thoughts? > >
