No, Piotr’s proposal has nowhere mention of changing live urls. He only proposes creating single use staging urls for voting purposes, which enables various technical conveniences he elaborated.
To avoid confusion, let me repeat: Piotr’s proposal is only concerned of staging URLs; live/asf-site URLs will stay as is. On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 23:22, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 19, 2023, at 1:47 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023, at 16:31, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> I am -1 (i.e. - code commit veto) on any code change that causes the > >> Log4j 2 web site url (https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/) to no > >> longer work. > >> Since the staging site is a prelude to the live site I have to assume > >> this change will cause the main site url to change so I am -1. > >> > >> To be honest I am a little pissed. This all came about because > >> Christian wanted to switch to Jekyll [...] > > > > Why are you pissed? I am sorry if I would be the reason > > 1. I indicated I didn’t want changing to Jekyl to be the reason for > changing to Jekyll. So far, that appears to be the reason. I thought you > mentioned something about getting CI to work but the current process could > have been automated as well. > 2. Switching to Jekyll seems to have changed the target directory with > dire consequences. As I stated, my experience with the ASF “CMS” is that > you can “layer” web sites on top of each other by using sub-dirs of the > content directory. I don’t recall the details as it has been several years > since I migrated the web sites from the old CMS to the Git tooling provided > by infra. But what I did was deliberate and on purpose. > 3. The final consequence is that it seems that we must now use > logging-log4j2.staged.apache.org/log4j/2.x < > http://logging-log4j2.staged.apache.org/log4j/2.x>. Since staging is > supposed to exactly match live this means the live url now has to be > logging-log4j2.apache.org/log4j/2.x < > http://logging-log4j2.apache.org/log4j/2.x>. That is unacceptable. > > Ralph