Christian,

Deprecation and moving to separate modules are not the same thing at all. I 
would be +1 to moving everything on this list that isn’t outright removed to 
separate repos. I have stated that several times.  Gary is strongly against 
doing that.

If you are somehow equating deprecation with moving to a separate repo then you 
are voting on the wrong thing. This vote is basically on what will be removed 
and no longer supported in 3.x.

Ralph

> On Oct 31, 2023, at 2:00 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1 to all - deprecation to me means we add a label that we plan to remove it 
> in 3.x, but we are not removing it not. We can step back.
> 
> Many of those modules don't look as if they need to belong in the main repo. 
> I can accept kubernetes/docker stuff, but not in the main repo.
> 
> I have a strong +1 on removing all JNDI features immediately, making them 
> available for those poor souls in a separate repo. I opened another thread 
> where I asked why we need this at all because it seems pointless to me. JNDI 
> is also a hazardous word within this project.
> 
> About the rest I don't have strong feelings
> 
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023, at 09:44, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>> This is a vote to deprecate the following `2.x` modules and features
>> and remove them from the `3.x` release:
>> 
>> * `log4j-cassandra`:
>> * CouchDB appender:
>> * `log4j-docker`
>> * GELF appender:
>> * Kafka appender:
>> * `log4j-kubernetes`:
>> * JeroMQ appender:
>> * JNDI-related features:
>> * `log4j-jpa`:
>> * Jackson based layouts (JsonLayout, XmlLayout, YamlLayout)
>> * `log4j-mongodb3`:
>> * `log4j-spring-boot`:
>> * Java EE SMTP appender:
>> * Jakarta EE SMTP appender:
>> * `log4j-taglib`:
>> 
>> Please cast votes for each module/feature separately on this mailing list:
>> 
>> [ ] +1,  drop the artifact/module,
>> [ ] +/-0
>> [ ] -1,  keep the artifact/module, because...
>> 
>> This vote is open for 168 hours (i.e. one week) and each deprecation
>> will pass unless getting a net negative vote count. All votes are
>> welcome, but only the Logging Services PMC votes are officially
>> counted.
>> 
>> Piotr

Reply via email to