Not quite IMO, the "project" here is "Loggging Services". The components inside LS, like Log4j, and so on are different types of items and I don't think we need to address the state of each. It might be nice to do but I do not think it is needed.
Gary On Wed, Nov 1, 2023, 7:47 AM Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote: > In the board report guidelines > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting#guidelines>, project > state is required to be described using the following keywords: > > - *New:* a top-level project that's just getting started > - *Ongoing*, with high, moderate or low activity, which you might > quantify if appropriate > - *Dormant:* not much happening on the code, but at least 3 PMC members > ready to engage if needed > - *At risk:* not enough active PMC members, or a significant number of > contributors left the project, etc. > - *Considering moving to the Attic:* a project that's about to move to > the Attic, or discussing that > > IMO, Log4net can be classified as "at risk", right? >
