Gary is correct on this. In the past we have broken out the sub-projects under the project activity section and project health sections. You can see that in your own previous reports (and those from Matt and myself).
Ralph > On Nov 1, 2023, at 5:48 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Not quite IMO, the "project" here is "Loggging Services". The components > inside LS, like Log4j, and so on are different types of items and I don't > think we need to address the state of each. It might be nice to do but I do > not think it is needed. > > Gary > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023, 7:47 AM Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote: > >> In the board report guidelines >> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting#guidelines>, project >> state is required to be described using the following keywords: >> >> - *New:* a top-level project that's just getting started >> - *Ongoing*, with high, moderate or low activity, which you might >> quantify if appropriate >> - *Dormant:* not much happening on the code, but at least 3 PMC members >> ready to engage if needed >> - *At risk:* not enough active PMC members, or a significant number of >> contributors left the project, etc. >> - *Considering moving to the Attic:* a project that's about to move to >> the Attic, or discussing that >> >> IMO, Log4net can be classified as "at risk", right? >>
