Hi Matt, On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 19:44, Matt Sicker <m...@musigma.org> wrote: > > Alright, after looking at the differences, I’m strongly in favor of the > Palantir version. The differences in how it handles lambdas solves one of the > main complaints I ever had about the Google version.
The only disadvantage of the Palantir version is that it does not provide/support an Eclipse plugin: https://github.com/palantir/palantir-java-format/issues/833 The code for Eclipse is still there, it just isn't published anywhere (AFAIK): https://github.com/palantir/palantir-java-format/tree/develop/eclipse_plugin Gary, would it be a big inconvenience using Palantir instead of the Google AOSP format? Piotr
