Hi all,

Since `commons-logging` 1.3.0 was published last month and it supports
Log4j API out-of-the-box, does it still make sense to keep `log4j-jcl`
around in 3.x?

I would keep the 2.x version, so that users don't need to modify their
stacks. However we might assume that 3.x adopters are already running
the latest versions of the remaining dependencies, specifically they
upgraded `commons-logging`. This is why I would propose to remove
`log4j-jcl` from 3.x.

Remark that Spring users have been using `spring-jcl` for a very long
time (which also supports the Log4j API), so they didn't need
`log4j-jcl` either.

Piotr

Reply via email to