Fine by me. Ralph
> On Jan 10, 2024, at 3:11 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Since `commons-logging` 1.3.0 was published last month and it supports > Log4j API out-of-the-box, does it still make sense to keep `log4j-jcl` > around in 3.x? > > I would keep the 2.x version, so that users don't need to modify their > stacks. However we might assume that 3.x adopters are already running > the latest versions of the remaining dependencies, specifically they > upgraded `commons-logging`. This is why I would propose to remove > `log4j-jcl` from 3.x. > > Remark that Spring users have been using `spring-jcl` for a very long > time (which also supports the Log4j API), so they didn't need > `log4j-jcl` either. > > Piotr
