Hi Jan
I think you're right. It's been so long since I've used svn as a daily
driver - even longer since I wrote a build system in c++ that hooked into
svn and triggered workloads on commits at the server 😅. Thanks for
figuring it out.
-d
On 02 March 2024 18:50:14 Jan Friedrich <freeand...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
I think I got it uploaded (from my machine).
choco install svn
svn co https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging -N
apache-dist-logging-dev
cd apache-dist-logging-dev
svn up log4net
svn delete .\log4net\binaries\*2.0.14.*
svn add .\log4net\binaries\*
svn add .\log4net\source\*
svn commit -m 'v2.0.16'
Â
Take a look at
Â
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net/binaries/Â
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net/source/Â
@Davyd: Maybe we missed the bold lines on Friday?
Â
Regards.
Jan
Friday, March 1, 2024, 6:27:38 PM, you wrote:
Hi Volkan
Thanks for taking the time to explain (:
This is pretty-much what I did, as per step 16
of https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/blob/master/doc/RELEASING.md -
unless there's a typo I've made somewhere or something like that. That's
why I'm confused as to why I can't see the artifacts in the right place ):
No need to rush on this though - monday is fine: I very likely won't do
anything about it until then anyway (:
-d
On 2024/03/01 18:21, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
Davyd, assuming you have `svn` in the command line, following should > get
the job done:
  # Checkout the `dev` distribution repository
  svn co https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging logging-dist-dev
  cd logging-dist-dev
  # Delete old distribution files
  svn rm log4net
  # Add the new distribution of the new release
  mkdir -p log4net/2.0.16
  cp /path/to/distribution/files log4net/2.0.16/
  svn add log4net
  # Commit changes
  svn commit -m 'Add `log4net` version `2.0.16` distribution files'
I presume you are using Windows. Getting `svn` in the Windows shell is >
explained in this SO post. >
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2341134/command-line-svn-for-windows>
Let me know if this does/doesn't help.
Good luck!
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 5:02 PM Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
  Hi Volkan
  That was my whole point with the question on my release vote: I
  have put things in svn, bit I'm not seeing them at the url you've
  posted. I assume I've done something wrong, but I don't know what
  and need someone to help. I must admit my svn-fu is rubbish so
  perhaps I just messed up there. With the other svn repos, I use
  git svn bridge, but I don't want to do that here because that repo
  us huge and filled with binaries
  TL;DR Halp! 😅
  -d
  On 01 March 2024 15:46:24 Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote:
  Davyd, I am afraid it cannot qualify an official vote if the [source]
  distribution artifacts are missing. This is the whole point of
  the ASF
  release ceremony. Binary artifacts, Website, GitHub, VCS, Nuget,
  etc. can
  be the most important mediums for you and/or the project, though
  they are
  irrelevant from an ASF point of view.
  Could you upload the source distribution to the `
   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging /log4net`
  Subversion folder
  along with checksum and signature files, please?
  On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 2:19 PM Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
  Hi all
  This is the vote to release Apache log4net version 2.0.16
  Website:
   https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/release/release-notes.html
  GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net
  GitHub release (pre-release):
   https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/2.0.16-rc1
  Distribution: I'm not sure -
   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net should have
  2.0.16 binaries and source (I've added via SVN), but I'm not seeing
  them. Any help appreciated.
  Please have a look at the staging site & artifacts and test (if
  you can
  - clone, `npm i`, `npm test`)
  [ ] +1, release the artifacts
  [ ] -1, don't release, because....
  (thanks Piotr: I copied most of your last VOTE mail!)
  -d