Hi Matt, On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 20:29, Matt Sicker <m...@musigma.org> wrote: > > Well, one thing that changed in JUL is that it requires the java.logging > module. Otherwise, the Java 8+ stuff is for the System.Logger API.
Right, maybe a 3.x version of `log4j-jul` would be useful. Besides the artifact has an optional dep on `log4j-core`. We might want to split it into 2 artifacts. Regarding `log4j-to-jul`, it is so rarely used, I don't see the point to maintain two identical versions. Summarizing: * `log4j-iostreams`, `log4j-slf4j-impl`, `log4j-slfj42-impl`, `log4j-to-jul` and `log4j-to-slf4j` could be removed from `main`. * `log4j-jpl` and `log4j-jul` should stay. Do you agree? Piotr
