Can’t people submit patches via email still?

Also, we have mailing lists for notifications and such that can’t realistically 
be folded in dev@ because of the immense traffic differences.

> On Aug 14, 2024, at 08:17, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> 
> I thought gitbox was still an alternative to having to use GitHub to submit 
> PRs. That said, it wouldn’t be for discussions, etc.
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Aug 14, 2024, at 3:31 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I think that to "deactivate" the mailing lists you refer to would be very
>> bad and might not even be allowed by Apache.
>> 
>> You cannot/shouldn't force people to create a GitHub (Microsoft) account
>> just to talk to us.
>> 
>> Odd as it sounds, I've had someone told me they would not submit a PR
>> because they did not want to create a GH account. It feels
>> counterproductive from my POV not to submit PRs but it shouldn't lock
>> people out.
>> 
>> There might also be parts of the world where GH is not available but Apache
>> servers are (more of a geopolitical issue).
>> 
>> Gary
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024, 3:43 AM Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Gary,
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 12:15, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> While it is a different community, I have received negative feedback in
>>>> Commons against the trend to spread information all over the place, and
>>> we
>>>> don't use GitHub.
>>>> 
>>>> The TLDR is that in the past it was easier to find information because
>>> you
>>>> only had the mailing list and later Jira. Now you have multiple mailing
>>>> lists, Jira, emails from GitHub, plus discussions in GitHub PRs, plus
>>>> Slack. Adding to the list is GitHub issues...
>>> 
>>> Might I propose a split of concerns between GH Discussions and the
>>> mailing lists:
>>> 
>>> * We use GH Discussions as a replacement for `log4j-user`,
>>> `log4net-user`, `log4cxx-user`. Two of these mailing lists are dead
>>> anyway, since subscribing to a ML for a one-off question is a hustle.
>>> * We use `dev@logging` as always for reaching consensus and decisions
>>> concerning the directions we choose for development.
>>> 
>>> BTW: Can we deactivate all the mailing lists except `dev`, `private`
>>> and `security`?
>>> 
>>> Piotr
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to