On Thu, Oct 3, 2024, at 18:10, Gary Gregory wrote: > FWIW, I don't think apache voting guidelines allow for "you can only vote a > certain way only if ..."
That's why I wrote: "Please CONSIDER voting ONLY -1, if:" Cheers, Christian > > Gary > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024, 3:30 PM Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> We have discussed this in the past. I hope we can pick up a decent dev >> speed with Flume after we adopt it. I don't regret moving it into Logging >> Services, but we have not seen any significant movement. >> >> This message (private, please don't quote from it), on the other hand, is >> significant: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/b6ndsy30j239s3fw0o2tqwm9cwmv3801 >> >> I want to call a vote to move Flume to dormant. Dormant means only it >> receives the Dormant label, and we move it to the dormant tab on our main >> website. This will give our users the correct information that we are *not* >> actively maintaining Flume. Dormant does not mean we are dropping it. >> Whenever PMC members or committers want to work on it, they can; when we >> see significant movement on the sub-project, we can label it as active. >> >> As I see it now, there is no active oversight or development. We, Logging >> Services, consider this dormant. For transparency and risk assessment, we >> need to be open about this status. >> >> Please vote: >> >> [] +1, label Flume as dormant >> [] -1, don't label Flume as dormant because... >> >> Please consider voting ONLY -1, if: >> >> - you are willing to reply to the message linked above within the next 72 >> hours with helpful information (the usual timeframe to respond) >> - AND you are willing to maintain this project in the next few months, >> which means upgrading dependencies, taking care of security, and -at least- >> acknowledging bug reports and responding to them >> - AND you are willing to check, validate, and vote on a new release if it >> happens >> >> I would like to highlight that we are not changing code here; to me, this >> is a procedural vote. Since we need three PMC members to maintain a >> release, I consider this project active if at least three PMC members >> commit to the above. >> >> Kind regards >> Christian >> >> -- >> The Apache Software Foundation >> V.P., Data Privacy >>
