+1 On 2 October 2024 21:29:44 CEST, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org> wrote: >Hello everyone, > >We have discussed this in the past. I hope we can pick up a decent dev speed >with Flume after we adopt it. I don't regret moving it into Logging Services, >but we have not seen any significant movement. > >This message (private, please don't quote from it), on the other hand, is >significant: >https://lists.apache.org/thread/b6ndsy30j239s3fw0o2tqwm9cwmv3801 > >I want to call a vote to move Flume to dormant. Dormant means only it receives >the Dormant label, and we move it to the dormant tab on our main website. This >will give our users the correct information that we are *not* actively >maintaining Flume. Dormant does not mean we are dropping it. Whenever PMC >members or committers want to work on it, they can; when we see significant >movement on the sub-project, we can label it as active. > >As I see it now, there is no active oversight or development. We, Logging >Services, consider this dormant. For transparency and risk assessment, we need >to be open about this status. > >Please vote: > >[] +1, label Flume as dormant >[] -1, don't label Flume as dormant because... > >Please consider voting ONLY -1, if: > > - you are willing to reply to the message linked above within the next 72 > hours with helpful information (the usual timeframe to respond) > - AND you are willing to maintain this project in the next few months, which > means upgrading dependencies, taking care of security, and -at least- > acknowledging bug reports and responding to them > - AND you are willing to check, validate, and vote on a new release if it > happens > >I would like to highlight that we are not changing code here; to me, this is a >procedural vote. Since we need three PMC members to maintain a release, I >consider this project active if at least three PMC members commit to the above. > >Kind regards >Christian > >-- >The Apache Software Foundation >V.P., Data Privacy
Jan
