GitHub user swebb2066 added a comment to the discussion: Next Log4cxx Major release thoughts
> option 2 would be the most flexible but it would also take some time to > implement What is wrong with [the current Log4cxx "plugin" support](https://logging.apache.org/log4cxx/1.8.0/extending-log4cxx.html) that you would fix? > the entire library needs to be recompiled, and this could lead to dependency > hell. Modern package managers (e.g. vcpkg, conan) make building from source less of a problem, and they support optional components well. Are you addressing only the binary distribution package managers? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/discussions/519#discussioncomment-18509641 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
