>
> (same reason svn uses the "svn:" in the properties that SVN expects to
> "own")
So, it's almost like a protocol or namespace more so than a class package. I
guess it's just the use of the "." which is kind of confusing to me then.
The "." indicates to me that it's a class I guess from an eyeballing it
perspective, but in fact, you're using it more like a protocol or namespace
URN, which would kind of dictate ":" as your "svn:" example shows.
I think something like "solr:<class name>", where <class name> can be:
* FQDN class name
* class name w/o FQDN with FQDN package in {default set} prefixed
Wouldn't that make more sense?
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
