: So, it's almost like a protocol or namespace more so than a class package. I
: guess it's just the use of the "." which is kind of confusing to me then.
eh ... i suppose ... it's really more of a package alias.
: The "." indicates to me that it's a class I guess from an eyeballing it
well, it is a class: we're just shortening the package of the class for
readability and so if we want to refactor and move it to a different
o.a.s.* package, most peoples configs won't break.
: I think something like "solr:<class name>", where <class name> can be:
:
: * FQDN class name
: * class name w/o FQDN with FQDN package in {default set} prefixed
:
: Wouldn't that make more sense?
if we used "solr:" then i'm not sure why you'd ever need/want a full class
name with package -- the whole point is to save people form having to
write it.
In any case: i think that ship has sailed. it would be kind of silly to
change it now (people have their arguments for getting rid of it, but
*changing* seems like it would just confuse people)
:
: Cheers,
: Chris
:
: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
: Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
: Senior Computer Scientist
: NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
: Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
: Email: [email protected]
: WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
: Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
:
:
:
: ---------------------------------------------------------------------
: To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
: For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
:
-Hoss
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
