OK it sounds like this (attribution as a comment in each unit test) may be a problem.
So maybe another option is to have the CHANGES.txt entry describes the addition of these tests and include a link to Manning's site? CHANGES.txt is our normal way for giving attribution so this seems reasonable? Mike On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Michael McCandless > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Marjan (CEO of Manning) likes the idea, but asks if we can put a >> comment at the top saying this came from LIA2 with a link the book's >> page at manning.com. I think that's OK? Any objections? > > Some ASFer's might... > > http://markmail.org/message/niv75qat7sjmmuoy?list:org.apache.legal-discuss > > Should someone bring it up there? > > -Yonik > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
