Wouldn't be NOTICE.txt the right place for this? ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 12:06 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: lia2 tests for branch_3x ? > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:42:48PM -0400, Michael McCandless wrote: > > So maybe another option is to have the CHANGES.txt entry describes the > > addition of these tests and include a link to Manning's site? > > > > CHANGES.txt is our normal way for giving attribution so this seems > reasonable? > > +0.1. OK by me. > > There are a lot of important contributions that don't make it into CHANGES.txt, > so I'd still say that the canonical record is the SVN log. And going forward, I'm > uncomfortable having to draw the line between what's important enough to go > into CHANGES.txt and what isn't. Rather than giving credit, the primary > purpose of the CHANGES file is to provide users information they need to know > when upgrading, isn't it? > > However, I don't want to be too much of a stickler and get in the way of a nice > contribution here and now. > > Thanks for the contribution! > > Cheers, > > Marvin Humphrey > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional > commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
