On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I still think Maven should be a downstream issue.
+1 Maven has never been a required part of our releases, and I don't think we should change that. We should also keep in mind that there's nothing really official about a "release manager". There's no reason the person(s) that signed the normal release need to be the same person that signs the maven stuff (but it should be a PMC member if it's hosted by the ASF). If there are people around during a release that want to handle the maven stuff, that seems fine. It does *not* have to be the release manager. It seems fine to make reasonable accommodations if some are working on making maven artifacts available at roughly the same... but if not, it should not hold up the release. -Yonik http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
