On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>wrote:
> > With what part? Do you mean to say you wish to make maven a required > part of our releases? > If so, perhaps you should call a vote? > > It sounds like maybe we should, since the situation seems ambiguous at the moment, and there is a lot of different opinions/disagreement. Though we should make it clear what we are voting on: 1. having the maven stuff in our source code. 2. maven being part of the release process. As far as #1 goes, to me its just like any other code. We have some other code already with no tests and I don't think thats reason to remove it from the source tree, when it can be improved by adding tests. However, I don't think its acceptable that the release process (#2) is currently undefined wrt maven. I think we need to get this nailed down, i think we need a well-defined release process. -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
