[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917018#action_12917018
 ] 

Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2655:
------------------------------------------

bq. go back to how trunk how buffers deletes (maps to docID), but per-DWPT.

I don't think we need seq ids for the flush-by-DWPT merge to trunk.  I was 
getting confused about the docid being a start from, rather than a stop at.  
I'll implement a map of query/term -> docid-upto per DWPT.

bq. Basically, the DWPT change, alone, is hugely valuable and (I think) 
decouple-able from the trickier/riskier/RAM-consuminger RT changes.

Yes indeed!

bq. I'll try to use the right name

NRT -> RT.  The next one will be need to be either R or T, shall we decide now 
or later?




> Get deletes working in the realtime branch
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2655
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2655
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>    Affects Versions: Realtime Branch
>            Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
>             Fix For: Realtime Branch
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2655.patch
>
>
> Deletes don't work anymore, a patch here will fix this.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to