Hi Ryan, thx for your answer. You mean there is room for improvement and volunteers?
On Friday, November 5, 2010, Ryan McKinley <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Christopher - > > I do not believe there is any active work on this. From what I > understand, the Tier implementation works OK within some constraints, > but we could not get it to pass more robust testing that the other > methods were using. > > However, LatLonType and GeoHashField are well tested and work well -- > the Tier type may have better performance when your index is really > large, but no active developers understand it and no-one has stepped > up to figure it out. > > ryan > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Christopher Schmidt > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> I saw a mail thread "Rethinking Cartesian Tiers implementation" (here). >> Is there any work in progress regarding this? If yes, is the current >> implementation deprecated or do you plan some enhancements (other >> projections or spatial indexes) ? >> I am asking because I want to use Lucene's spatial indexing in a production >> system... >> >> -- >> Christopher >> twitter: @fakod >> blog: http://blog.fakod.eu >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Christopher twitter: @fakod blog: http://blog.fakod.eu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
