[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13974083#comment-13974083
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5612:
-------------------------------------

I havent tried the latest patches yet. I'm currently looking at another bug 
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5616)

> LockStressTest fails always with NativeFSLockFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5612
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5612
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.8
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-5612-instant-crush.patch, 
> LUCENE-5612-instant-crush.patch, 
> LUCENE-5612-more-sophisticated-crusher.patch, 
> LUCENE-5612-more-sophisticated-crusher.patch, 
> LUCENE-5612-more-sophisticated-crusher.patch, LUCENE-5612-tester.patch, 
> LUCENE-5612-tester.patch, LUCENE-5612.patch
>
>
> I was looking at this, because i wanted to remove the static map inside 
> NativeFSLockFactory (no particular reason: it just smells bad, we require 
> java7, and you get overlappingexception as of java6 so its unnecessary).
> Before changing any code, i wanted to run lockstresstest first, just to 
> ensure it works: but it fails always. Simple works fine always.
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: 
> java.lang.RuntimeException: lock was double acquired at 
> org.apache.lucene.store.VerifyingLockFactory$CheckedLock.verify(VerifyingLockFactory.java:67)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to