[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13974334#comment-13974334
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5612:
--------------------------------------------
Thanks Uwe, this looks nice!
For some reason (not sure why?), even with the same default delay 1
msec, the test now always fails for me, which is great.
+1 to commit.
Then we get to figure out how to fix the actual bug :)
> LockStressTest fails always with NativeFSLockFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5612
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5612
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.8
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-5612-instant-crush.patch,
> LUCENE-5612-instant-crush.patch,
> LUCENE-5612-more-sophisticated-crusher.patch,
> LUCENE-5612-more-sophisticated-crusher.patch,
> LUCENE-5612-more-sophisticated-crusher.patch,
> LUCENE-5612-more-sophisticated-crusher.patch,
> LUCENE-5612-more-sophisticated-crusher.patch, LUCENE-5612-tester.patch,
> LUCENE-5612-tester.patch, LUCENE-5612.patch
>
>
> I was looking at this, because i wanted to remove the static map inside
> NativeFSLockFactory (no particular reason: it just smells bad, we require
> java7, and you get overlappingexception as of java6 so its unnecessary).
> Before changing any code, i wanted to run lockstresstest first, just to
> ensure it works: but it fails always. Simple works fine always.
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException:
> java.lang.RuntimeException: lock was double acquired at
> org.apache.lucene.store.VerifyingLockFactory$CheckedLock.verify(VerifyingLockFactory.java:67)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
