[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14007092#comment-14007092
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5680:
-------------------------------------
I'm gonna restate: I don't think we should allow updating values to missing.
There is no real use case for this, and it is absurdly complicated (it has
completely hijacked this issue).
> Allow updating multiple DocValues fields atomically
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5680
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5680
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Shai Erera
> Attachments: LUCENE-5680.patch, LUCENE-5680.patch, LUCENE-5680.patch
>
>
> This has come up on the list (http://markmail.org/message/2wmpvksuwc5t57pg)
> -- it would be good if we can allow updating several doc-values fields,
> atomically. It will also improve/simplify our tests, where today we index two
> fields, e.g. the field itself and a control field. In some multi-threaded
> tests, since we cannot be sure which updates came through first, we limit the
> test such that each thread updates a different set of fields, otherwise they
> will collide and it will be hard to verify the index in the end.
> I was working on a patch and it looks pretty simple to do, will post a patch
> shortly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
