[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14067913#comment-14067913
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-5837:
--------------------------------------
bq. It is a specialization, because instead of a branch for null, you have a
branch checking class of the numericdocvalues. and if this one fails, the whole
thing gets deoptimized and hotspot goes crazy.
Doesn't it happen already if you have two fields that have different
compression?
> Only check docsWithField when necessary in numeric comparators
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5837
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5837
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.0, 4.10
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-5837.patch, LUCENE-5837.patch
>
>
> Our numeric comparators have branches to deal with missing values. However
> there are some cases when checking docs that have a field is not useful:
> - if all docs have a value
> - if no docs have a value
> - if the missing value is 0
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
