[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070388#comment-14070388
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5473:
-----------------------------------

bq. But here it is an overkill

I think that may be a fine argument to make, but then I wish you would address: 
when you put in tmp stuff that is not designed with solid abstractions, it 
generally leads to bad places as devs leave, fall off, change, other devs start 
cranking on that code, etc.

You can read through my comments above for more details, but this has been my 
main concern. Putting in a bunch of stuff that is hard for new devs to 
understand, that's half way between two worlds, that counts on the same devs 
coming back and finishing later, that tends to be a red flag to me.

The commenting, the plan for deprecation, comments to make new devs able to 
understand any of this, that seems really lacking. Currently, I think 
abstractions is the best way to solve a lot of that. I'm willing to be shown it 
can be done without that though.

My feeling is that it's currently implemented like one organization or entity 
owns the code, and not like it's going into a melting pot with an extremely 
unpredictable future, as it is.

> Split clusterstate.json per collection and watch states selectively 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5473
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5473
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: SolrCloud
>            Reporter: Noble Paul
>            Assignee: Noble Paul
>             Fix For: 5.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-5473-74 .patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74.patch, SOLR-5473-74_POC.patch, 
> SOLR-5473-configname-fix.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, 
> SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, 
> SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, 
> SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, 
> SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, SOLR-5473.patch, 
> SOLR-5473_undo.patch, ec2-23-20-119-52_solr.log, ec2-50-16-38-73_solr.log
>
>
> As defined in the parent issue, store the states of each collection under 
> /collections/collectionname/state.json node



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to