[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14086190#comment-14086190
 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5850:
---------------------------------------

bq. But it should be if 4.9.1 is going to have any significant changes. 
Otherwise if we make a mistake, we cant correct it, as we will be unable to 
differentiate between 4.9 and 4.9.1 indexes.

I agree, this is why we decided to do it differently. But this would not 
prevent a bugfix release of current 4.9 branch. It would just use the old 
semantics to only write the major x.y version to the index files.

I 100% agree, we should fix this in 4.10!

My question on this issue was just: Should I commit the current work and we 
then open a new issue to merge MAIN_VERSION and Version.java, as Ryan suggests? 
This issue has many cleanups and better tests, so its easier as base for the 
big "Version" refactoring by Ryan.

> Constants#LUCENE_MAIN_VERSION can have broken values 
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5850
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5850
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: general/build
>    Affects Versions: 4.3.1, 4.5.1
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>             Fix For: 5.0, 4.10
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-5850.patch, LUCENE-5850.patch, LUCENE-5850.patch, 
> LUCENE-5850.patch, LUCENE-5850.patch, LUCENE-5850.patch, 
> LUCENE-5850_bomb.patch, LUCENE-5850_smoketester.patch
>
>
> Constants#LUCENE_MAIN_VERSION is set to the Lucene Main version and should 
> not contain minor versions. Well this is at least what I thought and to my 
> knowledge what the comments say too. Yet in for instance 4.3.1 and 4.5.1 we 
> broke this such that the version from SegmentsInfo can not be parsed with 
> Version#parseLeniently. IMO we should really add an assertion that this 
> constant doesn't throw an error and / or make the smoketester catch this. to 
> me this is actually a index BWC break. Note that 4.8.1 doesn't have this 
> problem...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to