On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Shawn Heisey <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems backwards to me as well, so I echo Steve's sentiment. The > other path seems a lot more likely to have a clean result. That said, I > know that you and Robert are very intelligent people, and that I can > only aspire to your understanding of our code in particular and code > manipulation in general. > > So we're in an intermediate state, and Robert has a large amount of > backporting to do. When that's done, do you both have a *very* high > degree of confidence that we're going to end up with branch_5x that's > nearly equivalent to trunk, with a releasable Solr, minus those few > things that are not ready? Can we avoid putting the entire branch under > a microscope to be sure everything's reasonably clean? > Why is it backwards? because you don't like my choice of tools or methods? Maybe i use a different IDE you dont like as well, but that doesnt matter. If you dont trust what i did, just review the differences yourself. I highly recommend "diff -urN -x .svn -x .caches" P.S. A big part of the reason i did this was your voiced unhappiness about the .war stuff not being ready etc. Its mechanical but kind of a pain, still safe. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
