[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14165027#comment-14165027
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6000:
-------------------------------------

{quote}
 The only caveat I see is this would require embedding a small amount of java 
code (100+ lines or so?) into the jflex files.
{quote}

Actually I don't like that caveat much either. It makes the code harder to 
refactor and maintain. We can think about it later, but its already much better 
here.

> Remove StandardTokenizerInterface
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6000
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6000
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ryan Ernst
>            Assignee: Ryan Ernst
>             Fix For: 5.0, Trunk
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6000.patch
>
>
> This interface existed for backcompat, so that each impl had at least some 
> common minimal interface, and could be used by StandardTokenizer.  However, 
> in LUCENE-5999 backcompat for standard tokenizer was implemented using 
> separate named classes.  We should remove this interface, as it no longer 
> serves a purpose.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to