[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14165027#comment-14165027
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6000:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
The only caveat I see is this would require embedding a small amount of java
code (100+ lines or so?) into the jflex files.
{quote}
Actually I don't like that caveat much either. It makes the code harder to
refactor and maintain. We can think about it later, but its already much better
here.
> Remove StandardTokenizerInterface
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6000
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6000
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ryan Ernst
> Assignee: Ryan Ernst
> Fix For: 5.0, Trunk
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6000.patch
>
>
> This interface existed for backcompat, so that each impl had at least some
> common minimal interface, and could be used by StandardTokenizer. However,
> in LUCENE-5999 backcompat for standard tokenizer was implemented using
> separate named classes. We should remove this interface, as it no longer
> serves a purpose.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]