[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12978816#action_12978816 ]
Neal Granroth commented on LUCENENET-380: ----------------------------------------- Thanks Alex, What would be the plan for handling the Sharpen artifacts that prevent the converted code from being built by the .NET SDK compiler? Do you envision a post-conversion script to strip out statements like: using Java.Lang using Java.IO and replace Sharpen-specific classes with standard .NET classes: Sharpen.Collections.* Sharpen.Runtime.* > Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool > ------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENENET-380 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380 > Project: Lucene.Net > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: George Aroush > Attachments: 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_AfterPostProcessing.zip, > 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_NoPostProcessing.zip, IndexWriter.java, > Lucene.Net.3_0_3_Sharpen20110106.zip, Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip, > Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101114.zip, NIOFSDirectory.java, QueryParser.java, > TestBufferedIndexInput.java, TestDateFilter.java > > > This task is to evaluate Sharpen as a port tool for Lucene.Net. > The files to be evaluated are attached. We need to run those files (which > are off Java Lucene 2.9.2) against Sharpen and compare the result against > JLCA result. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.