"Ideally I think the goal would be to modify sharpen till it outputs buildable C# with no pre/post."
so basically a fork of the sharpen code base? On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Alex Thompson (JIRA) <[email protected]>wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12978878#action_12978878] > > Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380: > ----------------------------------------- > > Ideally I think the goal would be to modify sharpen till it outputs > buildable C# with no pre/post. > > Sharpen is build on the abstract syntax tree components of Eclipse so it > seems pretty workable. > > > Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool > > ------------------------------- > > > > Key: LUCENENET-380 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380 > > Project: Lucene.Net > > Issue Type: Task > > Reporter: George Aroush > > Attachments: 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_AfterPostProcessing.zip, > 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_NoPostProcessing.zip, IndexWriter.java, > Lucene.Net.3_0_3_Sharpen20110106.zip, Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip, > Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101114.zip, NIOFSDirectory.java, QueryParser.java, > TestBufferedIndexInput.java, TestDateFilter.java > > > > > > This task is to evaluate Sharpen as a port tool for Lucene.Net. > > The files to be evaluated are attached. We need to run those files > (which are off Java Lucene 2.9.2) against Sharpen and compare the result > against JLCA result. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > -- Michael Herndon Senior Developer ([email protected]) 804.767.0083 [connect online] http://www.opensourceconnections.com http://www.amptools.net http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-herndon/4/893/23 http://www.facebook.com/amptools.net http://www.twitter.com/amptools-net
