[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14270267#comment-14270267
]
Ahmet Arslan commented on SOLR-6936:
------------------------------------
Hi [~guipulsar], please ask this kind of questions on solr user mailing list :
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/discussion.html
You will get a lot of answers there.
> Bitwise operator
> -----------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6936
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6936
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: jean claude
> Labels: cql, features, newbie, performance
>
> Hi,
> i am just new to SOLR , i come from sql , would like to swicth to nosql/solr
> (with raik 2 perhaps) ,
> all my app is designed for search in number like this
> where bob & 6 and foo & 1 and manymanyfields & 134 ,etc...
> I insist on the fact i have many fields..the logic is all input value are
> numbers (1,2,4,8,16,etc) , all inputs are capped to 50 choices max by input ,
> so its an app for search common interest between people , from sql the
> bitwise & was perfect because it avoid to put a ton of keywords string in a
> big post size... many bench in past was made and we designed application like
> this for performance reasons..
> All is here , thats why its very powerfull to search with bitwise operator
> rather list of string..
> I just read all the doc and i didn't find reference, so i guess this option
> doesn't exist in SOLR ?!
> If yes, can i say why and is there some chance to see this new feature comes
> nearly ?
> Scuse my poor english i'm too french..:)
> Any help or advises are welcome,
> gui
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
