> > What does this mean? > Jason, it was just my (obviously weird) humor. Let's aim at March 1.
Robert, you're right. I should have written a Lucene/Solr 3.1 release. Shai On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > After some discussion on IRC, I'd like to propose we release 3.1 soon. > We've > > always said we should release more often than we do, and 3x, being the > > stable branch, is the perfect candidate. We've created a 3.2 version in > > JIRA, and started to re-assign 3.1-marked issues. If you have any issue > > you'd like to get into 3.1, please re-assign it back (but, note the > > tentative release date below). > > > > A tentative release date for 3.1 would be March 1st (yyyy.3.1). Given > that > > the next 3.1 (date) will be in 2012 only (and we cannot be sure about > 2013 > > at all ...), let's try to make it to this year's :). > > > > What do you think? > > > > +1. > > I would really really prefer that if possible, we issue a Solr 3.1 > release at the same time. > > We can test everything at once, this should just be a matter of > packaging things correctly for the users. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
