+1 On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote: >> What does this mean? > > Jason, it was just my (obviously weird) humor. Let's aim at March 1. > > Robert, you're right. I should have written a Lucene/Solr 3.1 release. > > Shai > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > After some discussion on IRC, I'd like to propose we release 3.1 soon. >> > We've >> > always said we should release more often than we do, and 3x, being the >> > stable branch, is the perfect candidate. We've created a 3.2 version in >> > JIRA, and started to re-assign 3.1-marked issues. If you have any issue >> > you'd like to get into 3.1, please re-assign it back (but, note the >> > tentative release date below). >> > >> > A tentative release date for 3.1 would be March 1st (yyyy.3.1). Given >> > that >> > the next 3.1 (date) will be in 2012 only (and we cannot be sure about >> > 2013 >> > at all ...), let's try to make it to this year's :). >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> >> +1. >> >> I would really really prefer that if possible, we issue a Solr 3.1 >> release at the same time. >> >> We can test everything at once, this should just be a matter of >> packaging things correctly for the users. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
